Chapter
2
A DEEPER COMMUNICATION
In the story of the tower of Babel, the descendants of Noah were able
to understand each other because they had "one language and few words.
" In this section of my paper we will look at a mode of communication
that lies deeper than words. By gaining an understanding of this
communication, we may begin to understand how communication on this
level will allow people to better understand each other. This
section will also provide an insight as to what a mind-body split is
and how it can develop. I'll start by sharing what can be learned
from commissurotomy, or split-brain patients.
Split Brain Patients
The cortex of the brain is divided into two hemispheres (more on the
brain will be discussed in the section on health and disease).
The left hemisphere is responsible for language based skills such as
reading, writing speaking, and analytical skills. The right hemisphere
is responsible for sensory information and spacial relations.
The hemispheres communicate through a bundle of nerves called the corpus
callosum.
It was found that severing the corpus callosum in people with severe
epilepse would ease their seizures (Jaynes, 1976). This operation
is called commissurotomy or split-brain operation.
The following is what we can learn from these people.
In an experiment, a person who has undergone a split-brain operation
is shown two different pictures with each eye (Jaynes, 1976).
Information received from the right eye processes in the left hemisphere
of the brain while information received from the left eye processes
in the right hemisphere. The person is then asked to draw, without
looking at the drawing, what they seen. The person will draw
what was shown to the left eye and processed by the right hemisphere.
If asked what they have drawn, once again without looking at
the drawing, the patient will insist they have drawn what was seen in
the right eye and processed by the left hemisphere (Jaynes, 1976).
There is a gap in the patient's perception. These patients would
behave relatively normal. An outside observer would not see anything
peculiar and the patients themselves would not feel any different after
adjusting to their new condition (Jaynes, 1976).
In another experiment, a patient was shown a series of photographs flashed
into the different visual fields. When a photo of a nude girl
was flashed into the left visual field, the patient (who was probably
male) would grin, giggle, and blush. When asked what he saw he
would say it was nothing but a flash of light (Jaynes, 1976).
This patient's body is reacting to something that he is not aware of
and cannot articulate in speech.
While a split-brain patient is a special case, I include it here because
it is evidence of the possibility to behave and act relatively normally
while having a gap in perception, and not even knowing that such a gap
is present. Perhaps in everyday life there could be sensory input
that we are not fully aware of, that we react to without fully understanding
why. It may even be possible that an individual will make up
a reason for their actions that they do not understand even when it
is not true. Let us take a look at the various ways that we can
receive information.
Channels of Communication
Mindell (1988) is the founder of process oriented psychology.
It is an extension of Carl Jung's work. Carl Jung studied
dream imagery as messages from the unconscious. Mindell (1988)
took this work a step further and also recognized bodily symptoms as
messages from the unconscious. He recognized several "channels,"
he called process channels, from which information is brought
into awareness, or communicated to the individual. Process
is "the total flow of what is happening, the conscious and also the
unconscious. Process means the constant change of signals in
their many channels" (Mindell, 1988, p. 8). It is these "channels
of communication" that I wish to introduce.
The visual communication channel refers to information received visually
such as, sight, color, dreams, and visions. It can include stories,
mythology and intuition. Reading is a function of the visual
channel. The auditory channel includes information received auditorily
such as sound, music, language, grammar, and tone of voice (Dennehy,
1989). The visual and auditory channels can be further divided
into verbal and nonverbal channels. Language is received verbally.
Crying, yelling, and sighing are examples of nonverbal communication
received through the auditory channel.
The proprioceptive communication channel refers to information received
through body phenomena such as feelings, pain, pressure, tension, and
temperature (Dennehy, 1989). Body symptoms that indicate a disease
is present constitute information received from the proprioceptive channel.
Since his work is directed towards the therapy process, Mindell
(1985) does not discuss smell and taste as process channels, however
I include them in the proprioceptive channel. The kinesthetic
channel includes information received through movement or lack of movement.
This would include facial expressions, gestures, and incomplete
motion (Dennehy, 1989).
The other two channels Mindell (1985) mentions are combinations of the
basic four. They include the relationship channel and the world
channel. The relationship channel includes information received
through relationship or lack of relationship. The sexual impulse
can be understood as input from both the relationship channel and proprioceptive
channel. The world channel includes perception from the outside
world such as job, money family, world events, and the universe.
Mindell (1985) associates the visual and the auditory channels with
the mind. The proprioceptive and kinesthetic channels he associates
with the body, and the relationship and world channels are associated
with the universe, or what I call the environment.
The
Mind-Body Split
Mindell (1985) suggests, "people identify themselves with particular
channels, with their 'main' channels and tend to dissociate themselves
from other channels" (p. 23). These dissociated channels become
"secondary processes" which then become unconscious. Mindell
(1985) states that "stressing one aspect of the personality over long
periods of time impoverishes another aspect and separates the individual
. . . into parts" (p. 7). Here we have the foundation for a mind-body-environment
split by focusing primarily on the mind channels over the body and the
environmental channels. Mindell (1985) notes that the visual
channel is usually most developed. Language is perceived through
the visual channel by reading and the auditory channel by hearing speech.
Rules and belief systems are created with language. When
the rules and beliefs that we live our lives by conflict with the information
received through the body channels, a mind-body split is created.
Bradshaw (1988) explains how family dysfunction occurs due to "inadequate
rules or belief systems" (p. 37). These rules are based on "shoulds",
"musts", and "oughts" that determine an individuals behavior and ultimately
take one away from their feelings, thoughts, perceptions, decisions,
and dreams. He calls these rules "abusive and shaming" (1988,
p. 2). Shame is the feeling that one is no good. While
it has its place in a healthy psyche, when it is chronic, it can become
the core of one's identity giving rise to "depression, alienation, self-doubt,
isolating loneliness, paranoid and schizoid phenomena" as well as many
other disorders (Bradshaw, 1988, p. 2). Shame is sometimes understood
as the "master emotion" (Karen, 1992). To compensate, Bradshaw
(1988) says, "one develops a false self in order to survive" (p. 3).
This constitutes, a mind-body split. Body sensations are
denied and become unconscious or a secondary process to the rules created
through language and received through the mind channels. The
person is no longer whole, but fragmented into parts. There is
a gap in perception similar to, although not as drastic as, the gap
in perception experienced with the split-brain patients. This
gap in perception ultimately effects the way one perceives one's self,
others and the world around them.
Third Versus First-Person Perception
Third-person perception is objective observation from the outside
in; First-person perception is subjective observation from the
inside out (Hanna, 1986). When perceiving another from the third-person
perspective, "the phenomenon of a human body is perceived" (Hanna as
cited in Greene, p. 102). Behavior and dialogue can be observed
through the visual and auditory channel, however, the "inner workings"
of a human being are not visible from the third-person perspective.
First-person perception allows us access to all inner feelings,
sensations, intentions, and internal functioning.
In viewing oneself from the third-person, one can develop what Fromm
(1947) called a "marketing orientation. " An orientation is the
way an individual relates to the world. The marketing orientation
is where one views oneself as a commodity to be bought and sold in the
market place; bought and sold, at the cost of one's internal experiences.
In communicating with another person from a third-person perspective,
language will be full of words that objectify the other. From
this perspective it would be easy to command that person's behavior
based on a set of rules that may contradict that individual's internal
experiences. If the other views the communicator as an authority,
they may disregard their own internal experiences and live by the communicator's
rules, thus creating for the other a mind-body split.
In communicating from the first-person perspective, language would be
filled with words that convey the internal experience (Greene, 1995).
From this perspective, the purpose of communication is to convey
ones own experiences. It does not objectify the other nor does
it command their behavior. The individual is free to process
the information they are given and act on it based on their own internal
experiences.
Implications
of Deeper Communication
The following is a passage from Levine (1992) which I include because
it gives a wonderful example of being"in tune" with the different channels
of input:
The wind shifts. The grazing impala are
poised to a hair trigger of acute alertness. They smell, listen,
and look. Danger is in the air. It is in the form of a
few molecules of a new, but familiar scent, diluted in millions of parts
of air. The impala will flee, or, if they find no further cues,
return to their grazing. In the same split second, the cheetah,
hidden and waiting, also knows that the moment must be seized.
It leaps up from behind the bush. The herd of impala spring together
as one organism. They flee for the cover of the thickets at the
perimeter of the wadi. (p. 85)
The impala are able to sense and flee from the potential danger.
Levine mentions the "impala spring together as one organism. "
The cheetah's actions that ultimately provoke the response become a
part of the performance. The cheetah and impala operate together
as one unit in what might be referred to as an intimate play based on
subtle clues from sensory input. Had one of the impala stopped
to ponder whether fleeing would be socially acceptable, it might fall
short and become cheetah lunch (which is ultimately good for the cheetah).
By increasing awareness of the deeper channels of communication one
can gain a greater awareness of self in their surroundings. Self
and other no longer act solely as separate individuals but as one organism.
Empathy and intimacy can increase. Empathy is defined
by Kohut (as cited in MacIsaac and Rowe, 1989) as, "the capacity to
think and feel oneself into the inner life of another person" (p. 15).
Intimacy, according to Moore (1994) is when, "the 'most within'
dimensions of ourselves and the other are engaged" (p. 23). Amodeo
and Wentworth (1986) claim, "intimate contact requires us to be in touch
with our real feelings" (p.16). Increasing internal awareness
will lead to an increase in empathy and intimacy and a greater unity
of humanity as self and other are engaged through their internal experiences
rather than through rules of behavior, received through the mind channels,
that often separate one from another on a deeper dimension.
The implications of learning to communicate based on the internal experiences
of the proprioceptive as well as non-verbal channels of perception allow
for a greater unity of humankind. Rather than operating as selfish
individuals that objectify self and other, we could begin to operate
as a single unit. Then perhaps, "nothing [we] propose to do will
be impossible for [us]" (Genesis, 11:6).
REFERENCES
- Amodeo, J. &
Wentworth, K. (1986). Being intimate: A guide to
successful relationships. New York, NY: Penguin.
- Bradshaw, J.
(1988). The family: A revolutionary way of self-discovery.
Deerfield Beach, FL: Health Communications.
- Dennehy, V.
(1989). Process oriented psychotherapy. dissertation.
- Fromm, E.
(1947). Man for himself: An inquiry into the psychology
of ethics. New York, NY: Fawcett.
- Greene, D.
(1995). Embodying
holism: A somatic perspective on communication.
Dissertation. Columbus OH: Ohio State University.
- Hanna, T. L.
(1986). What is somatics? in Somatic: Magazine/journal
of the bodily arts and sciences.
- Jaynes, J.
(1976). The origin of consciousness in the breakdown of
the bicameral mind. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
- Levine, P.
(1992). The body as a healer: A revisioning of trauma and anxiety.
In Sheets-Johnston, M. (Ed.), Giving the Body its Due
(pp. 85-108). New York, NY: New York State University Press.
- Karen, R.
(February, 1992). Shame. The Atlantic Monthly.
40-70.
- MacIsaac, D.
& Rowe, C. (1989). Empathic attunement: The technique
of psychoanalytic self psychology. Northvale, NJ: Jason
Aronson.
- Mindell, A.
(1985). A river's way: The process science of the dreambody.
Boston MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
- Mindell, Arnold.
(1988). New developments in Jungian Psychology: Jungian
Psychology has a daughter. Journal of Process Oriented Psychology.
1 No. 1. 1-16.
- Moore, T.
(1994). Soul mates: Honoring the mysteries of love and relationship.
New York, NY: Harper Collins.
- (1982).
The holy bible: Revised standard version. Nashville,
TN: Holman.
Next
Chapter
Return
to Table of Contents
|